Multi
Media Presentation
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
EXCELLENT
|
PROFICIENT
|
ADEQUATE
|
LIMITED
|
Content
|
Presents
in-depth content with details and examples. Subject knowledge
is excellent. Comparisons are numerous, clear and insightful.
|
Presents
content that demonstrates essential knowledge about the topic
with clear details & examples. Comparisons are clear.
|
Presents
content that demonstrates basic knowledge about the topic with
some details & examples. Comparisons are attempted but lack
clear and insightful
|
Presents
content that indicates little or no basic knowledge about the
topic. No relevant details or examples.
|
Mechanics
|
No
misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Very
few misspellings and/or mechanical errors. The errors do not
detract from the meaning or quality of the presentation.
|
Noticeable
misspellings and/or mechanical errors. The errors detract from
the meaning or quality of the presentation. |
Numerous
misspellings and/or mechanical errors. The errors constantly interfere
with the meaning of the presentation. |
Organization
|
Content
is very well organized using headings, bulleted lists or tables
to group related material. |
Content
is well organized and related material is grouped together. Overall
organization of topics is logical and clear. |
Some
content is organized, but related material is not grouped. Little
evidence of overall organization. Sometimes difficult to understand. |
Adequate
content but no organizational structure. Confusing.
|
Oral
Presentation
|
Interesting, well-rehearsed with polished delivery that constantly
holds audience attention. Clearly confident and well prepared. |
Relatively
interesting, rehearsed with a smooth delivery that holds audience
attention. |
Sometimes
difficult to follow. Delivery fragmented or unrehearsed. Holds
audience attention most of the time. |
Very
difficult to follow. Delivery clearly unrehearsed and disorganized.
Audience attention lost. |
Originality
|
Product
shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and
inventive. |
Product
shows original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. |
Product
generally uses other people's ideas (giving them credit). There
is little evidence of original thinking. |
Product
uses other people's ideas, without giving them credit. No evidence
of original thinking. |
Sources
|
Source
information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All
documented in desired format. |
Source
information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most
documented in desired format. |
Source
information collected for most graphics, facts and quotes, but
not documented in desired format. |
Very
little or no source information was collected or documented. |
Attractiveness
|
Product
makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. All
are thoughtfully integrated to enhance to presentation. |
Product
makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance
to presentation. |
Makes
use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. Occasionally these
detract from the presentation content. |
Makes
use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract
from the presentation content. |